Look all shia momins,
I presented him the Hadith of Masoom Imam Baqar(asws) and in reply to this Hadith this kharji guy has presented the Fatwa of a person
"
Aytaullah Sistani has declared that it is not 'jayaz' to say sahadate salesa in tashhud. Therefore it is clear cut bida'h.
"
Rejecting Hadith of Imam(asws), is KUFR.
Rejecting Hadith of Imam(asws), is KUFR.
Regards,
Hasnain Naqvi
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:25:59 -0700
From: jamiahmad@yahoo.
Subject: Re: [shia_strength] Namaz without Wilayat e Ali(asws)
To: shia_strength@
CC: hrnaqvi12@hotmail.
Salam Alaikum,
Shahadate salesa has no place in namaz. Its the worst Bidah to say namaaz is useless without aliyunwaliullah.
Aytaullah Sistani has declared that it is not 'jayaz' to say sahadate salesa in tashhud. Therefore it is clear cut bida'h.
Anybody saying shahadet salesa in tashahud is a clear cut enemy of shariah. These people should be banned from joining with shais as these are ghali bidati people and have nothing to do with shias.
PLS REFER http://www.qoitrat.org/Qa/FindQueV.asp
| Quran-o-Itrat Academy |
| >>Homepage >>Ask Question >>Search Question >>View Topic Wise Questions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From: Hasnain Naqvi <hrnaqvi12@hotmail.
To: "shia_strength@
Sent: Wed, May 19, 2010 3:36:47 PM
Subject: [shia_strength] Namaz without Wilayat e Ali(asws)
Dear All,
In Suwab ul Amal page 225 by sheikh saduq
Imam Baqar(asws) says, any one who opposes Wilayat e Ali(asws), it is upon him whether he offer prayer or does zana.
means any one who opposes Wilayat e Ali(asws), It does not differ whether he offer prayer or do zana.
Lanet on all muqassareen.
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy.
In Suwab ul Amal page 225 by sheikh saduq
Imam Baqar(asws) says, any one who opposes Wilayat e Ali(asws), it is upon him whether he offer prayer or does zana.
means any one who opposes Wilayat e Ali(asws), It does not differ whether he offer prayer or do zana.
Lanet on all muqassareen.
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy.
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more.
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
whatever the total population of muslims is there in this world 90% is sunni.Prophit Mohammed propagated Islam for all people whether he belongs to his family or not.In this context i would like to ask two basic question.
ReplyDelete1 Why did prophit not warn Ali against abubkar Omar Osman, Ayesha, Hafsa and other sahabas in his life?
2.The incident of ghadeer took place on 17 zilhaja Prophit died on 12 Rabi ul awal (84) days after, in this short period I want to ask what happened all forgot Ghadeer and chose Abubakar their first Caliph even Ali did not oppose
Dear Mr. Arshad,
DeleteFirstly please provide a reference for your statistic that 90% of the world's Muslim population is Sunni. Secondly, even if that is the case, Islam was only a minority when the Prophet (pbuh) started preaching and the majority were kuffars. Numbers don't justify the correctness of a religion.
The basis for Shia Muslims (and majority of Sunni Muslims as well) for giving preference to the immediate family of the Prophet (pbuh) on Islamic affairs is because the Quran praises the family of the Prophet (pbuh) in multiple verses for e.g.:
"...Allah desires to keep any uncleanness from you people of the House and make you pure as pure can be"
Qur'an(33:33)
"...say (O' Muhammad unto mankind): I do not ask of you any reward for it (preaching the message), but love for my near relatives Ahlul-Bait'; and whoever earns good, we give him more of good therein..."
Qur'an 42:23)
The Quran does not praise any other being in this way and thus, considering their superiority in the Quran, we praise them as guided by Allah. You should do the same as not following the Quran could lead you astray!
To answer your questions:
Delete1. Hazrat Ali (pbuh) had knowledge of all encounters, otherwise he would not have been the only man in history up to the Holy Prophet (pbuh) to claim "Salooni salooni, qabla an-tafqidooni" (Ask me, ask me anything! Before you lose me. I know the ways of the skies more than I know the ways of the earth). Your correct question should have been "Why did the Prophet (pbuh) not warn bibi ayesha, bibi hafsa etc beforehand. Please take the following as an example with multiple Sunni references for bibi ayesha, I'm sure you will find the same for the Muslim khalifas as well over you start researching.
We read in al Imama wal Siyasa, page 59 Chapter “Dhikr Jamal” with regards to Ayesha that:
“When she began her opposition to Ali, she and her supporters began to make their way to Basra. On route, the dogs of Hawab began to bark at them. Ayesha asked Muhammad bin Talha “Which place is this?” He said “Its is Hawab” to which Ayesha replied “Take me back for on one occasion Rasulullah (s) said, ‘Amongst you (wives) is one at whom the dogs of Hawab shall bark.’ He (s) said to me specifically, ‘Be careful, in case it is you’”.
Musanaf ibn Aby Shayba, Volumne 8 page 708
Musnad ibn Rahweh, Volume 2 page 32
Musanaf Abdulrazaq, Volume 11 page 365
Sahih Ibn Haban, Volume 15 page 126
Musnad Aby Y’ala, Volume 8 page 282
2. Firstly, please correct the date from 17 to 18 Zilhajj. Brother this should have been my question instead of yours. At least you are accepting that Ghadeer does mark the event where almost one hundred thousand Muslims witnessed the event of Rasool (pbuh) giving khilafat/wilayat to Hazrat Ali (pbuh) yet they rejected a direct order from the best person in mankind and the Prophet of Allah, Hazrat Muhammad (pbuh). Your khalifas were also there swearing allegiance to Hazrat Ali (pbuh):
"...Then a tent was pitched by order of the Holy Prophet who ordered the Commander of the Faithful, Ali to sit in the tent. The whole umma was commanded to offer bai'at (allegiance) to Ali. The Holy Prophet said that he gave this instruction in compliance with the command of Allah. The first one to offer allegiance on that day was Umar. Then Abu Bakr, Uthman, Talha, and Zubair followed suit, and all these people continued offering allegiance for three days (i.e., while the Holy Prophet remained there).
This event has been recorded in over 60 Sunni books, however I'm only staying the first five here:
1. Imam Fakhru'd-Din Razi - Tafsir-e-Kabir Mafatihu'l-Ghaib.
2. Imam Ahmad Tha'labi - Tafsir-e-Kashfu'l-Bayan.
3. Jalalu'd-Din Suyuti - Tafsir-e-Durru'l-Manthur.
4. Abu'l-Hasan Ali Bin Ahmad Wahidi Nishapuri - Asbabu'n-
Nuzul.
5. Muhammad Bin Jarir Tabari - Tafsiru'l-Kabir.
The question is, if your elders did not give importance to this, whay excuse do you have now? What excuse did your elders have. How did they reject a direct order from Rasool (pbuh) and from the Quran? (Yes, there is an ayat on ghadeer).
The way you are asking questions, I'm pretty much getting the impression that you know almost nothing about Islamic history still you are one of those people who ask just for the sake of asking. Just to inform you, if Imam Ali (pbuh) hadn't opposed the khilafat of abu bakr, the door of Hazrat Ali(pbuh)'s house would never have been broken to take allegiance from Hazrat Ali (pbuh) and the Prophet's daughter (pbuh) would never have lost her baby. Please gets your facts straigh