Quran Interactive Recitations - Click below

Friday, April 29, 2011

[MahdiUniteMuslims] KHUTBAH : UNDERSTANDING MORAL PERFECTION

 

THE STREET MIMBAR

JUM'AH KHUTBAH (29 April 2011)

webpage: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=182501078290&ref=ts

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_street_mimbar/

PLEASE e-mail Suggestions & Criticisms to khutbahs@yahoo.com

It is in such a manner that We make plain Our signs so that the course of the

Criminals may become clear.

Bismillah Ar-Rahmaan Ar-Raheem.

Alhumdulillah. Peace and blessings on Muhammad (sallalahu alaihi wa sallam), his Noble Companions and Family.

Committed Muslims…

 

Audio on http://www.islamiccenterdc.com/apps/videos/videos/show/11910021-understanding-moral-perfection-khutbah-imam-muhammad-al-asi-06-02-2000 (06-02-2000)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG2pCdVQjZg

 

UNDERSTANDING MORAL PERFECTION

In our time, Allah has privileged us to live when one of the most critical decisions in our centuries of being has to be made and it has to be made in this generation and the coming generations; and this decision is a qualitative change in the way we adapt to/serve Allah. If we understand this, we understand why what is happening to us in the world today has taken on phases/stages of the deployment of force against us. Let us say that the Muslims have not exercised their capacity to be averse/hostile to dhulm/offensive policies and those who are responsible for it. This is a fact of life that no one can deny. The Prophet of Allah had to go through what we are required to go through and we have to make that leap ahead. There's no question of Allah's Prophet being of superior moral quality. He says but I have been commissioned to perfect moral quality; but that's not the only functioning capacity that the Prophet was in or when he was in that capacity he exercised it in all of his activities. It is common knowledge to you/any Muslim that the Prophet of Allah was forced- the same forced that is being used against the Muslims today was used against him. The instruments may be different. At the time they had spears/knives/machetes/arrows/swords; today they have machine guns/fighter bombers/weapons of mass destruction/the nuclear threat but in essence the use of force is not new. The Prophet eventually, because of the use of force and because of his dedication to Allah, Allah calculated that when they wanted to use force against him Allah wanted him to have a base in Al Madinah. These are not haphazard calculations. If you work for Allah, Allah will provide you with what is needed in the peculiarities of those circumstances

… and he who is conscious of Allah's power Allah will offer him a way out of the circumstances (in which human forces are deployed against those who are committed to Allah and are confident in His power presence here and now). (Surah At Talaaq verse 2)

The Prophet went, he had to go from Makkah to Al Madinah- what was called before Yathrib. When he first arrived, one of the first things he did was to draw up the declaration/document of Al Madina called in Islamic literature called As Sahifa/Sahifah Al Madinah/Dastur Al Madinah. When the Prophet drew up this document one of the first things he did, when he gained power to counter effect the opposing power that were in Makkah, was to describe the power presence of the Muslims in Al Madinah where the Prophet was now exercising authority- the authority that he receives from Allah. When he did so/referred in the Watheeqah/document of Al Madinah that he just drew up, how did he characterise people? In this document there's reference to only three categories of people- Al Muhajireen/Al Ansaar/ Al Yahud meaning those who were forced to leave Makkah because they had no power- this a power definition of people; and then those who provided support/power for the Prophet and the Muslims once they arrived in Yathrib and then Yahud who did not agree with the Prophet who were opposed to him from a power position. They had financial power/religious clout in Al Madinah and they had their alliances with other factions in that area. Why didn't he refer to people as Musalleen? That didn't occur in this new document that he drew up! Why didn't he refer to people as Muttaqeen/Sa'imeen or any of the other purely ritualistic descriptions that have become the common language of today's Muslims? Why did he refer to these three categories of people specifically and no one else? Because Al Muhajireen/Al Ansaar/Al Yahud represented a proximity to the exercise of power. This in particular is the area that the current Muslim thought process has not worked on and obviously Muslims are responsible for exercising power- and when they do they will do it in a clean way. They will not be tainted by it even though inevitably there will be individuals who will abuse/mis-locate/shun power but these are individuals and these are aberrations. Our central responsibility is to focus on this issue and to be concerned with it the same way Allah's Prophet was concerned with it. We all read the ayaat of the Qur'an. Allah says

… but governance belongs to no one else except Allah… (Surah Al-An'aam verse 57)

In another ayah

… there is no one who doubles with His judgement… (Surah Al Ra'd verse 41)

meaning there is no authority/person/power that can legitimately double as Allah or precede/ follow Allah's ruling/judgement/laws.

Allah says there is no annulment of Allah's command. Yeah! But you live in a world in which there are many forces and powers that are doubling in multiple fashions besides and in exclusion to Allah! These are the forces of Shirk; but how do Muslim Scholars who substitute for the Kafirs/Mushriks want you to understand Shirk? They want to bring your mind down/reduce your intelligence/insult your capacity to think and tell you "Shirk has to do with ascribing deities to Allah in matters of the graveyard." The whole Muslim Ummah has become a graveyard! Look! Wherever you look- East/South/North/West- any direction you want to go and the Muslims are being buried because of the use of brute force in their own lands. These forces of Kufr/Shirk open up warfronts at will. Remember Allah says

… and Allah does not have anyone share/compete/rival Him in His judgement/laws… (Surah Al Kahf verse 26)

Yeah?! OK- if you think that is what the Qur'an is saying look at what is taking place in real life. (Take a) look at these other powers that are rivalling Allah. You think Shirk is not alive? It is! And it has managed not only to reduce Muslim lands to graveyards but it has managed before that to reduce the Muslim mind to nil. The word Shareek here

… and praise Allah who has not a begotten a son/child and has no rival in issues of dominionship/ ruling/Sovereignty... (Surah Kahf verse 26)

Shareek and Mulk are two words that go together; not the Shirk that comes from accusations that "some people are worshipping at graves." This is an insult to Muslims. Who's the Muslim who worships a grave? Where did this come from? The whole Muslim Ummah is worshipping Kafirs/Mushriks because they are the imposed forces/powers on them! That they don't want you to think! You are not supposed to understand the issue at this level. You are supposed to carry this word of Shirk and begin to put on a microscope and identify the intentions of Muslims who go to the graveyard and then accuse them and say "they are Mushriks." When we no longer can identify the Mushriks in the world we begin to use these words against us and generate hostilities/animosities among the Muslims and the Mushriks are sitting pretty. At a distance they watch this commotion in Muslim lands- the Muslims are incapable of understanding what Allah is telling them and they are incapable of identifying who we are and they are laughing all the way to the massacre zones in Muslim lands. The Prophet of Allah had a task/mission that was to see to it that the committed Muslims are empowered. He did not go about that by reconciling himself to the status quo of the Kafirs. He did not go about that by sending out some Muslims to the major forces of the world at that time and lobbying them for the cause of Islam. He went about this as he was instructed by Allah and he became the character now that we cannot see! The Prophet of Allah himself participated in twenty-seven military operations beginning with Wadaan and ending with Tabuk. The Prophet of Allah was not a draft dodger/conscientious objector. He had to identify the forces that are hostile to Allah/the Qur'an/the Prophet/the committed Muslims and communicate with them with the language that they understand. Why did he do this? Because he is teaching us that there is no other way to do this. If there was some other way to reach a peaceful understanding/accommodation with the hostile forces around that cannot bear to hear about Islam/Allah/the Prophet/the Qur'an the Prophet would have shown us and that would have become the Sunnah that is binding on us; but there is no other way! This is the hard way. This is the only way. These forces of Shirk/Kufr have to be met at the battlefront and the Muslims are just beginning to revive the military character of their Prophet and this comes shining through in Chechenya. Why are the Imams in the Masjid afraid to mention Chechenya? We hear there is a law in Saudi Arabia in which it is not permissible for the Imam on Friday to mention specific places and breakdown in detail what is happening to the Muslims in these specific places! Why? We ask why are Muslims banned from expressing their minds/conscience on the Mimbar on Fridays at Salat Al Jum'ah in Al Masjid Al Haram in Makkah/Al Madinah and everyone else may speak about these issues. A Yahudi can speak about them in a Synagogue/syndicate; a Christian can do the same thing but when it comes to Muslims "Oh no you cannot speak about this." Why? "Because you will be militarising the Muslims!" Listen to this "logic." If Muslims speak about what is happening to their brother Muslims the impression that the non-Muslims have is that there is going to be a militarisation process taking effect within the Muslim rank and file. So what? What are we supposed to do? Other people are supposed to kill us and we're supposed to make believe that there is no evil in this world?! Other people are supposed to bomb us and we're supposed to look up to the fighter bombers and smile?! They can impose sanctions on us and we're supposed to say "there's a lot of good in this world but none of it is coming our way." We're supposed to presume the innocence of those who are taking away our lives?! Is this the Sunnah of the Prophet? Is this how he behaved with the Mushriks/Kafirs of his time/generations or did he put on his fighting gear and went to the battlefronts and participated in wars/military campaigns and fights that have become a model for us?! "No! This image of the Prophet is supposed to stay away." No khateeb/Imam is supposed to speak about these issues on Fridays even though all of them know this is the character of the person who they claim is their Uswah/Qudwah. How many times do they repeat the ayah in the Qur'an.

Certainly in the Apostle of Allah you have a prototype/living model… (Surah Al Ahzaab verse 21)

Where do you have it? You don't have it from the Mimbar/in the Masjid?! If these people today who claim "that they are following the Prophet" were there in the time of the Prophet, they'd tell him "to go and reach an agreement with the forces of the day/to sign off on military contracts that will protect the Muslims in Al Madinah." This is the Sunnah of the Saudis. They sign off with the Mushriks so that the Mushriks/Kafirs protect them in Makkah/ Al Madinah. Then they come to you and say "well brother- you're supposed to follow the Sunnah of the Prophet." And you ask him "well brother- what does the Sunnah of the Prophet mean?" And they tell you "the Sunnah of the Prophet is…" and then they begin on these private affairs of the Muslims "… the miswaak/tooth-brushing/brushing the teeth/putting perfume/good scent/musk on Fridays before you come to Jum'ah prayers/ entering the Masjid with your right foot and exiting with your left foot/sleeping on the right side/eating with your right hand." They speak about issues pertaining to your personal affects and then after they're done ask them "what else has the Prophet in his Sunnah?" They say "oh brother- you do this and you'll be in good shape. You do this. This is what is required." As if the Prophet did not exist in his adversarial role pertaining to the Mushriks/Kafirs! This is no longer a Sunnah. And if anyone wants to begin to think that this is a Sunnah they should be thrown into prison- which characterises what is happening in the world today. We ask these types of Muslims "did the Prophet spend ten years in a military mode with his military uniform on, (so to speak), so that I will know how to brush my teeth/put musk on Fridays on the clothes that I am wearing?! Is that what it was all about? Ten years of being exposed to death becomes a matter of me knowing how to eat from my plate!" The Sunnah has been reduced to the common sense/natural/intrinsic thing! It would be silly to say that the Muslims gave up to say that the Muslims gave up their lives for some petty/private/personal issues that we can all learn in a few weeks! Why have they been spending years/generations on something that we can all learn in a few weeks? Then, if there's a brave mind out there that wants to know the definition of who is a Kafir/Mushrik the final definition comes back to a fellow Muslim- the Muslim in the street/the oppressed Muslim who becomes the Kafir/ Mushrik?! We wish they had the integrity to point the definition of Kafirs/Mushriks to those who are ruling in Muslims lands. No! They are also exempt like the true Mushriks/Kafirs who are there masters. They are exempt and then the definitions come out to our neighbourhoods/ friends who we grew up with- these become the Mushriks/Kafirs even though they are people of the Qiblah/the Qur'an/the Prophet?! This is where we are.

 

(Do) you see how comfortable they look at us? (Take a) look… The green light now is given to the Russians to extend their military war operations to other parts of Central Asia. We are speaking about Chechenya and in the coming near future we're going to be witnessing other Chechenyas. Remember, this is what happens when we have dead people – dead in their heads- who are on the Mimbar. A few years ago we had Muslims who were forced to leave their homes in Bosnia. Remember Bosnia was a big issue- it brought out the largest demonstration of Muslims in the United States in history. This was only four/five years ago. What happened as a result of this war in Bosnia. Almost two-million Muslims became refugees. They no longer had a home/homeland. After these four/five years, we ask you, "is it common knowledge among the Muslims how many Bosnian refugees there is now?" We're not stretching your memory way-back into history. We're not expecting you to graduate with a degree in history. This is something that happened only a few years ago and these are supposed to be your brothers/sisters in Islam?! How many of them are refugees now, (we ask). The sorry answer to that is 99.99% of the Muslims don't know! The reason they don't know is because they are expected to be behind times when they come to the Masjid and they are expected to come out of the Masjid with no information at all. The Prophet did not want Imma'as. In a hadith of his, (or related to one of the Muslims that was "brought up" by him), he says I am not a simpleton and I'm not going to be fooled by one or I am not a fox and I'm not going to be out-foxed by one. And here we have the Muslims of our day and time… (Take a) look at how many tricks they bring to Dayton. Article Number six of the Dayton Accord was "all Muslim refugees must go back to their home." Of course, not many Muslims know that that was Article Number six in Dayton but what have the people who signed on/agreed to it, including these Governments in Muslim lands, done about it? If this issue of Muslims displacement in the world drops from the pages of Washington Post that doesn't mean it has to drop from the minds of the Imams/Khateebs in the Masjid?! But because we have these types of Masjids that are second fiddle to the Kafirs/Mushriks we have the opportunistic Muslims who come to the Masjid just to fulfil a tradition that they inherited. Fossilized that they are with no substance/content in their minds/hearts! They blow with the wind! These days/times are the times that we have to make that transition and we have dedicated and devout Muslims who are steps ahead of us.

 

The Muslims in the Philippines/Central Asia No one hears that in Central Asia in the past few months thousands of Muslims have been rounded up. These are not Muslims who are carrying arms, they're just carrying the right ideas that will sustain these arms when the time comes. There is a war against this type of Islam- the Islam of the Prophet and we salute these Muslims because we salute the Prophet himself who has shown us the way. The way is not a short-cut/secret negotiations behind closed doors or co-opting the Muslims in the Masjids of all places. The way is to identify who these Mushriks/Kafirs are and carry on with our responsibilities which we are beginning/will continue to do with confidence in Allah and distrust in these Mushriks/Kafirs even though those who are many decisions/policies for the Muslims have reversed this, placed their confidence in Kafirs/Mushriks and distrusted Allah.

 

Committed Muslims, brothers and sisters…

In bringing back the image/vision of Allah's Prophet no one should expect this whole issue of identifying who Allah's enemies are (to go away). We wish… Some people say "why do you speak about enemies. Rarely is there a khutbah that there is no reference to Allah's enemy." the answer to this is number one- is it/is it not true that there are enemies of Allah/humans who are committed to Allah? Do they not exist? Is this part of our imagination? Or are there hardcore political criminals who are satisfied by shedding the blood of a particular type of Muslim? Not any Muslim! A Muslim who consumes his life without any thought given to kufr/dhulm/shirk is a certified Muslim by these enemies of Allah. They don't want this Muslim to be hurt even by a thorn; but the other Muslims who want Allah as their Superior/Sustainer in their moral selves/societies are the types that draw our attention to these enemies. It's easier for us to pretend that they don't exist but if we do it is at a dear cost to us. (For) how long can we afford to remain oblivious of those who are igniting wars in our hearts/minds/communities/ lands? If we were to reduce this scenario to Makkah, (for those who don't have the geographic/demographic capacity to watch), as the whole Muslim Ummah is going up in flames, Makkah is burning and the Muslims are fiddling because they are incapable of defining who their enemies are. When the day comes and we have the freedom… Muslims don't have freedom, even in the United States. If they begin to put their minds at work they do not have freedom. They will continue to enjoy this superficial freedom as long as they are the citizens of Kufr and they are obedient servants of dhulm but the intensity that we love Allah we should have the same intensity of hate for Ash Shaytaan and the agents of Ash Shaytaan who have wreaked havoc beginning with our minds/schools all the way up to our Parliaments/Executives. Let us reconnect with Allah and His Prophet as our brothers around the world are beginning to reconnect with Allah and His Prophet. Strange things are happening. You have areas in the world where you have "hostages" but the media is looking the other way. If this event/hostage taking would have happened twenty/fifteen years ago the media would have pounced on the event (and) covered it from all angles. Why is the media blind to this now? Because, (and all grace is from Allah and due to Him), Muslims are beginning to gain their confidence in Allah and in themselves. The Hizbullah in Southern Lebanon have driven this lesson deep down inside the Muslim psyche. You have everyone jumping on this bandwagon of  a limited success of the Muslims and everyone wants to take credit for it and most of everyone does not have credit for it! It's those who relocated themselves/placed their heart/soul with Allah and His Prophet and carried the day. These Yahudis tell you "they are implementing a UN resolution." There are many other resolutions- why did they chose to implement a particular resolution that had to do with Hizbullah? Why didn't they implement the other hundreds of resolutions concerning them? They will continue to peddle their lies/propaganda and the Muslims will continue to approach Allah in the true sense of the word with their uniform on, (so to speak), the way Allah's Prophet had his uniform on- armed as they are supposed to be. They want to disarm people around the world; they're not going to be able to disarm the Muslims. It is part of our commitment to Allah.

 

This khutbah was presented by Imam Mohammad Al Asi on the occasion of Jum'ah on 2 June 2000 on the sidewalk of Embassy Row in Washington D.C. The Imam previously led the daily and Jum'ah prayers inside the Masjid. His speeches were revolutionary and thought provoking, and eventually irritated and threatened the Middle-East Ambassadors who control the Masjid. Finally, the Imam, his family, and other Muslims faithful to the course of Islam were forced out, into the streets. This khutbah originates from the sidewalk across the street from the Islamic Center, currently under seige.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
You Can Now Donate Online For Jammu and Kashmir Fund! Please Donate Generously.
http://hashimokera.blogspot.com/p/how-can-you-help.html
MARKETPLACE

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive