From: Hasnain Naqvi <hrnaqvi12@hotmail.
To: ahmad ahmad <jamiahmad@yahoo.
Cc: caabbas@ymail.
Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 3:32:22 PM
Subject: RE: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
And my fellow ahmad ahmad has shown himsef Kharji/deobandi by attacking the Azadari of Imam e Mazloom(as).
Wilayat e Faqih is totally against Shia aqaids. Because these new born people who are off-springs of Kharjis take religion from Ulema and we the true Shias take are religion from Maula not Molvi.
Read Nehjul Balagha Sermon 17 and 18 which is 100% against man made scholars who give different rulings based on their Ijtehad.
Ahmad ahmad is such an ignorant guy, that he uses the word as stated by ulema in order to prove Khooni Matam is not allowed. Any how Masoomeen(asws) has never ever prohibited it, instead according to fathers of ahmad ahmad for example Syed Mohammad Sherazi who was a Mujtahid e Azam he has extracted his rulings of Khooni Matam from the incident of Syed Zainab(sa) where She hit her Head.
I haven't said some illegitimate, but the Prophet Mohammad(saww) has said whosoever does not belief in Wilayat e Ali(asws), oppose Wilayat e Ali(asws) is an illegitimate, whether he is a muslim like ahmad ahmad or a Kharji like ahmad ahmad.
Regards,
Hasnain Naqvi
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:45:17 -0700
From: jamiahmad@yahoo.
Subject: Re: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
To: hrnaqvi12@hotmail.
CC: caabbas@ymail.
From: Hasnain Naqvi <hrnaqvi12@hotmail.
To: ahmad ahmad <jamiahmad@yahoo.
Cc: caabbas@ymail.
Sent: Sun, April 18, 2010 11:00:06 AM
Subject: RE: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
At the time of battle of Neharwan, Imam(asws) went to the kharjis and called them for Munazra, Imam(asws) answered all their questions, but those kharjis were not legitimate because of the character of their mothers so they never accepted the truth, even Imam(asws) was delivering Haq to them.
First of all, Shia religion was established by 12 Imams not by khomeni or khamnai etc. I cannot believe that this ignorant guy can write such an idiot statement "Because in his time Wilayate Faqih was not established. As we are aware that Wilayate Faqih has been established in 1980 by Imam Khomeini and present Waliye Faqih is Imam Khamnei. The command of waliye Faqih supercedes any other religious authority even a Marja."
Go and take with you your theory of wilayat e faqih, the concept of wilayat e faqih was not even present before 40 years.
It was khomeni who presented it, and it were the scholars of iran who accepted and made obligatory on all shia muslims.
1. Fatwa of Allama Hairi is still in the throat of Muqassareen, Hairi has said "there is no one who can go against Fatwa". No one means no one for muqaliddeen.
2. I told this ignorant guy earlier, that Syed Mohammad Sherazi was a mujtahid e azam, he has extracted his rulings on Azadari from the incident of Syeda Zainab(sa). Answer this? or go where your leaders( abu hurera, marwan, abu sufyan) went.
Regards,
Hasnain Naqvi
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 03:46:49 -0700
From: jamiahmad@yahoo.
Subject: Re: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
To: shia_strength@
CC: caabbas@ymail.
From: Hasnain Naqvi <hrnaqvi12@hotmail.
To: ahmad ahmad <jamiahmad@yahoo.
Cc: caabbas@ymail.
Sent: Fri, April 16, 2010 8:09:02 AM
Subject: RE: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
These people do not like to see what Hadith of Masoomeen(asws) says, they only know one thing is to show Fatwa of Mujtahid who is their Allah and Rasool.
When we show them not a Fatwa but Fatawa of Mujtahideen then these pick palls of new generation rejects the rulings of Mujtahideen and show us the true legitimacy of their blood.
When it is proven from thousands of books that Prophet Mohammad(saww) says, O Ali(asws) only a legitimate will Love you and only an illegitimate will hate you.
Every man who barks against Azadari e Imam Hussain(asws) is included in this above category of being an illegitimate.
Even ahle sunnah wal jammat are fond of doing azadari, I have hundreds of ahle sunnah friends which go with me on Ashura day and do azadari as we do.
Being a shia and barking against azadari is totally self contradictory.
The mentioned below Fatawa of Mujtahideen are a clear cut statements for Azadari, but these layman become self mujtahid when any things gets contradict with their belief which is because of their blood.
For example.
This answer was given by Ayatullah al-Uzma Syed Mohammad Sherazi who was a Mujtahid e Azam.
------------ -----
Answer:
TATBIR is a desirable act, and a MUKALLAF – i.e. one who has reached the adolescence age and is duty bound – may forsake a desirable act. It is not allowed to humiliate a Mu'min, and also one who does not do TATBIR may not humiliate or insult others, or accuse them (of false things).
Question:
What is your opinion regarding the reports that Lady Zaynab (AS), when she saw the head of her brother Imam Hussain peace be upon him, being paraded in public hit her forehead on the bar of the carriage she was travelling in, causing bleeding to flow from beneath her veil, which was visible to onlookers who witnessed the event?
Answer:
Yes that is proven.
{Some of the famous references, which confirm the above report, are as follows:
· Bihaar al-Anwaar; volume 45, page 114,
· Jalaa' al-'Oyun; volume 2, page 238,
· Zaynab al-Kubra; page 112,
· Asraar al-Shahadah; page 474,
· Al-Muntakhab; volume 2, page 478,
· Nusrat-ul-Madhlum; page 18.
Needless to say that 'Allamah al-Majlisi – compiler of Bihaar al-Anwaar – and Sheikh al-Shari'ah al-Isfahani have confirmed the authenticity of the report.}------------ --------- --------- -
Look here, Mujtahid e Azam is give rulings on Azadari based on the incident of Syeda Zainab(sa) hitting her head, but this ignorant guy(ahmad ahmad) gives his own fatwa ignoring mujtahid sherazi.
Similarly Abdul Kareem Hairi writes
"Furthermore their is no one who can prohibits this"....... ..... but this new mujtahid (ahmad ahmad) says that I am more knowledgeable then Hairi and gives a fatwa against his father.
Curse be on all those people who are against Zanjeer and Qama Zani.
Regards,
Hasnain Naqvi
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:41:15 -0700
From: jamiahmad@yahoo. com
Subject: Re: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
To: shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com
CC: caabbas@ymail. com; hrnaqvi12@hotmail. com
From: Hasnain Naqvi <hrnaqvi12@hotmail. com>
To: ahmad ahmad <jamiahmad@yahoo. com>; "shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com" <shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com>
Cc: caabbas@ymail. com
Sent: Tue, April 13, 2010 8:11:20 PM
Subject: [shia_strength] RE: zanjeerzani and qamazani
Al-Imam al-Sheikh Abdul Kareem al-Ha'ery
The Founder of the current Hawzah in the holy city of Qum.
"The hitting of swords on the heads (causing bleeding) is alright (allowed) provided there is no harm to the person doing this. Furthermore no one has the right to prohibit this (hitting the head with sword). In fact all kinds of TA'ZIAH – mourning – for SEYYED AL-SHUHADA' – Imam Hussain – may our souls be sacrificed for him, are MUSTAHAB – desirable deeds."
The above Fatwa by al-Imam al-Sheikh Abdul Kareem al-Ha'ery was endorsed and signed by the following eminent Maraje':
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Sheikh Muhammad al-Araki,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Muhammad Ridha al-Gulpaygani,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Shahab-el-Deen al-Mar'ashi al-Najafi,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Hassan al-Tabataba'e al-Qummi,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Muhammad al-Waheedi,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Mirza Jawaad al-Tabrizi,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Muhammad Saadiq al-Rouhani,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma Muhammad Mahdi al-Lankaroudi,
And many other Maraje' and eminent scholars . . .
Al-Imam al-Sheikh Muhammad Hussain al-Naa'ini,
The teacher of the Maraje' of the holy city of Najaf.
"There is no doubt as to the permissibility of the beating of the chest and the face with the hands to the point of redness or blackness (of the chest or the face). This is also extended to the lashing of the shoulders and the back with chains to the extent mentioned (above), and even if this led to bleeding. As for causing the bleeding of the head by sword beating, this is also allowed provided it does not lead to endangering harm, such as unstoppable bleeding or harm to the scull, etc. as it is known amongst the experts in doing this (hitting on the head)."
The above Fatwa by al-Imam al-Sheikh Muhammad Hussain al-Naa'ini was endorsed and signed by the following eminent Maraje':
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Mohsen al-Hakim,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Muhammad Kaadhem al-Shari'atMadari,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Abd-el-A'la al-Sabzewary,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Abul-Qassim al-Kho'i,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Muhammad Ridha al-Gulpaygani,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Ali al-Hussaini al-Seestani,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid Muhammad Saadiq al-Rouhani,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Mirza Jawaad al-Tabrizi,
- Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Sheikh Hussain al-Waheed al-Khurasani,
And many other Maraje' and eminent scholars . . .
Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid al-Kho'i
The former leader of the Hawzah of the holy city of Najaf.
Question: Is there any problem with causing the bleeding of the head – TATBIR – as it is practiced, to express one's grief about the martyrdom of our Imam Hussain peace be upon him, assuming there is going to be no permanent harm?
Answer:
There is no problem with that, given the assumption made in the question, and Allah knows best.
Question:
You stated that there is no problem in causing the bleeding of the head – known as TATBIR – if it does not lead to harm. It is said that it is not more than a permissible act, then can TATBIR be MUSTAHAB – desirable – if the intention was the upholding and honouring the Sha'a'er – signs of Allah – and sympathy with the Ahl-ul-Bayt, peace be upon them?
Answer:
Most probably Allah Almighty would give thawab – reward (the individual) – for sympathising with the Ahl-ul-Bayt if the intention is sincere.
Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Seyyid al-Seestani
The current leader of the Hawzah of the holy city of Najaf.
Question:
What is the ruling regarding the lashing with chains, chest beating, and walking on fire on the occasion of mourning the martyrdom of Imam Hussain peace be upon him?
Answer:
If (these are) not associated with extreme harm or loss of limb, there is no objection.
Question:
What is the ruling regarding wearing black, and chest beating when commemorating the martyrdom of Imam Hussain peace be upon him, as well as other infallible Imams peace be upon them?
Answer:
This is permissible, and in fact this is regarded as one of the best means of seeking nearness to Allah, since it is upholding and honouring the Sha'a'er of Allah Almighty. [This is a reference to the Qur'anic Ayah 22:32. – translator.]
Ayatollah al-Udhma al-Imam al-Seyyid al-Shirazi
Question:
Some individuals say that I do not see shedding my tears as enough to express my grief for Imam Hussain (AS), his household and his followers on the day of Ashura. So is hitting myself with sword and injuring myself is allowed?
Answer:
The Hussaini Sha'a'er, including TATBIR, are some of the RAAJIH issues. TATBIR is a MUSTAHAB deed, unless it leads to death, loss of limb, or loss of faculties. (RAAJIH means MUSTAHAB that could become WAJIB depending on the circumstances - translator.) .
Question:
What is your opinion regarding hitting the head with sword – TATBIR – on the day of Ashura whether or not it harms the individual?
Answer:
The most common and widely known opinion of the Fuqaha (scholars) is that the desirability (of TATBIR) is in it not being extremely harmful.
Question:
If one engages in the program of TA'ZIAH for Imam Hussain (AS), and goes on to serve the program of TA'ZIAH but does not do TATBIR, is he regarded as a sinner, who deserves to be humiliated?
Answer:
TATBIR is a desirable act, and a MUKALLAF – i.e. one who has reached the adolescence age and is duty bound – may forsake a desirable act. It is not allowed to humiliate a Mu'min, and also one who does not do TATBIR may not humiliate or insult others, or accuse them (of false things).
Question:
What is your opinion regarding the reports that Lady Zaynab (AS), when she saw the head of her brother Imam Hussain peace be upon him, being paraded in public hit her forehead on the bar of the carriage she was travelling in, causing bleeding to flow from beneath her veil, which was visible to onlookers who witnessed the event?
Answer:
Yes that is proven.
{Some of the famous references, which confirm the above report, are as follows:
· Bihaar al-Anwaar; volume 45, page 114,
· Jalaa' al-'Oyun; volume 2, page 238,
· Zaynab al-Kubra; page 112,
· Asraar al-Shahadah; page 474,
· Al-Muntakhab; volume 2, page 478,
· Nusrat-ul-Madhlum; page 18.
Needless to say that 'Allamah al-Majlisi – compiler of Bihaar al-Anwaar – and Sheikh al-Shari'ah al-Isfahani have confirmed the authenticity of the report.}Regards,
Hasnain Naqvi
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:53:54 -0700
From: jamiahmad@yahoo. com
Subject: zanjeerzani and qamazani
To: shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com
CC: hrnaqvi12@hotmail. com; caabbas@ymail. com
| |
|
|
From: Hasnain Naqvi <hrnaqvi12@hotmail. com>
To: "shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com" <shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com>; ahmad ahmad <jamiahmad@yahoo. com>
Sent: Wed, March 10, 2010 7:27:54 AM
Subject: RE: [shia_strength] please vote for the question
Lanet on all those people who oppose Azadari practices.
Regards,
Hasnain Naqvi
To: shia_strength@ yahoogroups. com; jamiahmad@yahoo. com
From: caabbas@ymail. com
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:58:55 -0800
Subject: Re: [shia_strength] please vote for the question
Thanks for your kind Vote. Khuda hafiz Abbas --- On Fri, 3/5/10, ahmad ahmad <jamiahmad@yahoo. com> wrote:
|
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started.
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started.
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy.
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more.
No comments:
Post a Comment